Friday, 15 November 2019
I have one of the funniest, quirkiest, most interesting thinkers as an analyst. Having worked with him for the time we have, he and I have become friends from the process, although due to the law we can only be friends in his office, not outside of it. Supportive, clever, a person who breaks the rules, he was one of the first to tell me I'm not mentally ill because of what I am going through, and acts more as a guide to help me reach conclusions and breakthroughs in therapy. This process can't lead to powerful results in the short term... analysis takes years of commitment, and anyone who wants to be a Jungian analyst must be in analysis for 5 years or more as part of their training... a sort of healing process, one needs to understand themselves to heal others. Also, one of course needs Jungian training, and as far as I know, a degree in something relating to the field, such as psychology or religious studies, considering how spiritual Jungian psychology can be. I don't know everything about the process due to not investigating becoming an analyst myself, but I believe that's what I was told at one point.
While Freudian psychology emphasizes a dynamic where the analyst has the upper hand in some ways (including the use of a chaise lounge sofa, often enough), in Jungian psychology, the analyst acts as a kind of guide, sitting directly across from the analysand, both client and therapist are equals in this regard. Freud decided man was driven by sex, Jung thought man's pursuits were higher, and had to do with relating to understanding one's Self, among other things. So, being asexual and in a spiritual malaise as I was, it only made sense that I would prefer Jung to Freud.
I am no expert on Jung - I kind of used that lack of expertise to an advantage when I wrote "The Jung Ones" to hint that the Ajna Project didn't get what it was doing, so in a way my imperfect knowledge of Jung wasn't even a true handicap. I did get my analyst to look over the comics as a kind of Jungian consultant, to make sure any glaring errors were corrected, and there were a couple I had to go back and fix here and there. He bought all my comics from me, which is cool - I have never had a doctor or therapist do that before. I still need to, of course, get the final book out, but I am taking a much needed break from art again, and am saving up money for printing. Some suggest I do crowdfunding, but I don't want to bother, knowing it would mean giving backers books as rewards that I would need for sales at my launch. Also, failure to make quota could be embarrassing, so screw it. I'll just save my pennies.
I once asked my analyst about the controversy with Jung being a "nazi sympathizer" - he had a good answer to this. It was only early when the nazis first formed that Jung saw it could be a positive, due to something he saw in them strengthening the German identity. But after it became clear what they were actually about, he had a horrible nightmare about bloodshed over Europe, it changed his mind about the nazis, and it began a stage of his life that would later lead to him creating "The Red Book", his strangest body of work, and one that the Jung grandchildren were at first hesitant to release. I have a copy of the reader's edition, but not the illuminated manuscript version, which is over $200.00 sometimes. It's a challenging read, but interesting, I have to try tackling it again.
I know Jungian analysis has helped me where conventional psychiatry has failed. Having an ear to listen to me without telling me I am sick and hopeless helped bigtime, and I like that there's almost an element of play to the approach, this makes therapy fun and creative. I get a great rate due to my financial circumstances, thank god because analysis can be pricey. I notice that in the long term, I have grown to get a knack for analyzing circumstances better, and see that both myself and others have had a tendency to overanalyze things, leading to anxiety and frustration. My assumption with politics online is that a lot of disputes erupt from overanalyzing what people are about when they speak their mind, leading to unnecessary bickering. Without the human connection of a face to face discussion, it's even worse online when it happens than in person. There are a lot of bad armchair psychologists out there, both on the right and on the left. Being an analysand has also helped me to understand why people act as they do, and thus be more empathetic to difficult individuals.
A good Jungian breaks it down to the bare minimum, not obsessing about every single detail... one must trim the lily in dream analysis, for example. I have learned how to do this from my therapist. I can easily spot a counsellor who might have work to do on themselves, based on how they respond to my discussion, and the look in their eyes as they do so. It's almost as though they're following this by-the-book method I have seen over and over again as to what to say to a client, they do not speak from the heart. My guy sometimes will just say "Oh, don't think that - you're full of shit... you know better than that" and tells me what he sees, his eyes full of confidence while he's doing it, and he's often right. I prefer a blunt response that is honest and cuts through nonsense to what most counsellors peddle - clearly my analyst has healed himself, knows himself, so he is qualified to help me. If a therapist doesn't even know who they are, how on earth can they heal their client? That's likely a common reason therapy can fail.